Two radically different concepts have been proposed
for the extinction of dinosaurs and many other organisms that did not survive
into the Tertiary Period; 1) the impact of a bolide
(asteroid, meteorite, or comet) with the earth and 2) a volcansim
induced ecological collapse.

Cretaceous Dawn ©
1996 George Arthur Bush
Mass Extinction:
Affected other organisms also. Terminal Cretaceous extinctions at
the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K/T) boundary. Fifteen percent of families
of marine shelled invertebrates: ammonoid cephalopods suffered total extinction,
clams and snails suffered greatly, shell protozoans (Foraminifera) had
heavy losses, mosasaurs and pleisosaurs (marine reptiles) suffered total
extinction, on land dinosaurs and pterosaurs suffered total extinction,
many types of marsupial mammals were affected, and some types of plants
were affected (ex.: cycad diversity decreased).
Evidence: Patterns of extinctions versus Process of extinction. Pattern: gradual or sudden (catastrophic). Have to look at the latest part of Cretaceous, Maastrictian Stage, 71 to 65 million years ago. (Paleocene dinosaur fossils probably transported.)
Hell Creek Formation, Montana: Only place we have with continuous deposition of continental rocks across K/T boundary that contains dinosaur bones. One set of researchers say dinosaur bones indicate a gradual decline in diversity during the Maastrictian rocks of the Hell Creek. Others, basically using the same data, say relatively sudden disappearance of dinosaurs. Of course much of the evidence depends on the naming of genera and species (controls how diverse the fauna is assumed to be), the bias of the rock record (are we seeing all the dinosaurs that really lived here at the time, the limited number of localities with continuous continental sedimentation across the boundary (maybe dinosaurs were more diverse in other parts of the world, where we don't have a record across the K/T boundary), etc. However, general consensus here seems to favor a gradual extinction.
Marine Evidence: The data of marine extinctions (particularly foraminifera) seem to indicate a more rapid extinction. But even here there is some disagreement (see discussion on page 413 and 414 in Fastovsky and Weishampel, 1996).
Bolide Impact: caused
dust cloud in atmosphere and rapid global cooling.
The Smoking Gun: The Chicxulub Crater on the Yucatan
peninsula.
1. 1977 Paper by Luis and Walter Alvarez - Gubio clay
layer with high iridium content at K/T boundary. Many other iridium
rich clay layers found around the world at K/T.
2. Shocked quartz grains also found at boundary.
3. C-13/C-12 ratios from planktonic foraminifera
in ocean sediments suggest that primary oceanic productivity (amount of
organic matter synthesized by organisms from inorganic materials and sunlight)
decreased by over 90% at K/T boundary.
4. Studies indicate that the marine organisms
that were most affected across the K/T boundary (i.e. suffered the most
extinctions) are the ones that depend directly upon primary productivity
(phytoplankton) for their food source.
4. Studies by paleobotanists of the U.S.G.S
and the Canadian Geological Survey of pollen distribution across the K/T
boundary in western North America appears to show extensive extinction
across the K/T boundary coincident with the iridium anomaly.
SO WHY DID THE DINOSAURS GO EXTINCT AT THE K/T BOUNDARY? (AND DID THEY SUDDENLY GO EXTINCT OR WAS THE EXTINCTION GRADUAL?): Verdict still out. But many feel that the Bolide impact is the most compatible with all the data and the most parsimonious explanation. However, many also favor a more gradual extinction due to climate change resulting from a volcanism; and of course, they say that this is more compatible with all the data.
The following quote from Fastovsky and Weishampel (1996)
in their recent textbook, THE EVOLUTION AND EXTINCTION OF THE DINOSAURS
(Cambridge University Press) illustrates the bolide impact view:
"Our view is that the patterns of extinction are concordant with
the asteroid impact hypothesis. For us, therefore, the extinction
of the dinosaurs remains best explained by the impact of an asteroid with
the Earth. ......We opt for the theory that we think explains all of the
data most satisfactorily." (p. 427).
SUMMARY STATEMENT
The dinosaurs and many other
plants and animals experienced extinction during the latest portion of
the Cretaceous Period. There are several hypotheses to explain this
mass extinction event at the end of Cretaceous time. However, only
two theories are supported by accumulated factual data, the catastrophic
bolide (meteorite, asteroid, or comet) impact theory and the gradualistic
volcanism theory. Both theories propose that dinosaurs (and many
other organisms) became extinct because of a change in climate. The
impact theory proponents say that a large meteorite, asteroid, or comet
(or perhaps several) hit the Earth, throwing up a large cloud of atmospheric
dust which blocked the radiation coming from the Sun. Of course,
this would cause it to get colder (somewhat like a supposed nuclear winter
scenario), plants on land and primary producers in the ocean would die,
thus the food chain would be broken. Proponents of the volcanism
theory also believe the climate got colder during the later part of the
Cretaceous (last few million years), but because of increased volcanism
during Late Cretaceous time. They propose that volcanoes blew huge
amounts of volcanic ash into the atmosphere, which blocked solar radiation
and thus caused the climate change and the gradual mass extinctions.
The gradualistic volcanism proponents do not think the volcanism occurred
suddenly, but occurred over several million years during latest Cretaceous
time and the climate gradually got colder. However, some proponents
of volcanism also propose a tremendous greenhouse warming right at the
end of Cretaceous time due to the increased output of carbon dioxide from
the Deccan Traps volcanism (in particular, Dewey McClean).
A major line of evidence
for both theories is several iridium rich (iridium is a rare element that
is relatively abundant in meteorites, comets, and asteroids, but also in
volcanic ash) clay layers that occur near the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary.
Shocked quartz grains also have been found in the clay layers and both
sides claim that the stress causing them supports their view (shocked quartz
grains show stress cleavage and have been associated with meteorite impact
sites, volcanic ash and debris at nuclear explosion sites).
Although the evidence is
still hotly debated, most paleontologists and geologists favor the gradualistic
volcanism theory, whereas most physicists and astronomers favor the catastrophic
bolide impact theory. A recent book by Officer
and Page (1996) discusses the controversy in great detail. They favor
the gradualistic volcanism theory. The complete reference for this
book is the following: Officer, Charles and Jake Page; 1996; The
Great Dinosaur Extinction Controversy;Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,
Inc.; 209 p.